turbo of kompressor?
#1
hee

zit te denken aan een turbotje of een kompressortje voor
mijn suzuki ignis sport iemand al ervaring ermee?


gr Jordy
Reply

#2
Zo ver ik weet.

Compressor

Duurder
Geen turbo lagg
Minder onderhoud

Turbo

Goedkoper
Turbo lagg
Meer onderhoud
Reply

#3
antwoord hier boven ben ik het niet helemaal mee eens.

compressor is duurder in onderhoud, meer mechanische slijtage.
en aandrijving van de compressor heeft groter verlies dan turbo.
op een kleine motor zal je meteen merken dat je in de lage toeren minder makkelijk oppakt.
[Image: nox6logo.gif]

info @ carservicekrimpenerwaard (punt) nl

MR2 SW20 gen 2 3SGTE @ 22Psi
Reply

#4
Kwam deze ook nog tegen.

Quote:TURBO vs SUPERCHARGER

Which one is best? Turbo vs supercharger? Let's take a look at what their pros and cons are:


Turbo Pros ( + )

Only one, where max boost / max power is required in full race, track application, where other considerations can be rejected, e.g. cost to build and develop, life expectancy etc.

Turbo Cons ( - )

Much higher boost pressure is needed in a turbo for the same bhp due to pressurized air being much hotter, due to conduction from red hot exhaust manifold.

Much more complex management needed in a turbo, to control fueling and ignition due instantaneous rise of boost pressure.

Higher pressures and temperatures encouraging detonation, turbo is the big engine destroyer.

More intercooling needed to cool inlet air.

Much higher under bonnet temperature making everything hotter and so reducing power.

High under bonnet temperature reducing life of things like wiring looms and hoses.

Much higher incidents of fire due to red hot turbo and manifold.

Compromise exhaust manifold and system function due to restriction of turbo not letting the gas flow freely.

Extra shock loadings on transmission because of sudden increase in power.


Supercharger Pros ( + )

Basically all the things the turbo is bad at the supercharger is good at.

Supercharger Cons ( - )

No dump valve to make a nice noise


For those building their own kit I would recommend always going to a supercharger 1 size above what the engine capacity suggests, as the price for the next size higher is quite small and if necessary put a restrictor in to reduce the boost. The reason I say this is that most people start off with quite modest expectations but as soon as they have it fitted they want MORE and if the supercharger they have already fitted is running at max capacity, they have to discard it and buy a complete new supercharger unit. This problem of running out of charger capacity is especially a problem if the engine is 1) High revving e.g. over 7000 rpm. 2) 16 valve unit, as they eat air quicker than 8 valves. 3) The compression is lowered.

Bron: http://www.tuninglinx.com/html/turbo-vs-...arger.html
[Image: 19092007048wz4.jpg]

http://www.teamswift.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=34155
Reply

#5
dus wat kan ik beter doen dan turbo lijkt mij ook ... leuker puur ook vanwege de dumpvalve.
Reply

#6
waarom geen combinatie van die twee?

een kompressor is goed voor laag tot midden toeren en dan gaat de turbo vanaf daar verder naar hoge toeren.
Daily: MK4 Swift 1.3 GS '00
Project: nvt
Fun: Tomos AT50 '82
Reply

#7
Succes met pas maken! Turbo past al net. Laat staat allebei!
Reply

#8
Doe mij maar een nette turbo setup!39
Reply

#9
dumpvalvegeluid... Zo fast and furious 2001..

Hij zit er bij mij op.. Maar om nou te zeggen dat ik er een stijffie van krijg.. Nee
Ford Mondeo 2.0 tdci
Swift Sedan 1.6 "Chucky"
Mazda RX-7 V8 circuit project
Suzuki Swift gti circuit auto

Ring count: 114

Reply

#10
ik heb nog ff naar die foto wezen kijken en die heeft inderdaad een turbo met supercharger op z'n gti zitten

[Image: 19092007056aq1.jpg]
Daily: MK4 Swift 1.3 GS '00
Project: nvt
Fun: Tomos AT50 '82
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.